3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]

Formaatopties
CSV downloadExports results in CSV that can be imported back into the current webform.HTML-tabelExports results as an HTML table.JSON-documentenResultaten exporteren als JSON-documenten.Karaktergescheiden tekstExports results as delimited text file.PDF-documentenResultaten exporteren als PDF-documentenYAML-documentenResultaten exporteren als YAML-documenten.
If checked, all entity references will use the entity's UUID
If checked, the download file extension will be change from .html to .xls.
Used to create unique file names for exported submissions.
Dit is het scheidingsteken dat wordt gebruikt in het CSV/TSV-bestand bij het downloaden van webformulierresultaten. Het gebruik van tabs in de export is de meest betrouwbare methode om niet-Latijnse tekens te behouden. Mogelijk wilt u dit wijzigen in een ander teken, afhankelijk van het programma waarmee u verwacht resultaten te importeren.
If checked, the generated file's carriage returns will be compatible with Excel and a marker flagging the data as UTF-8 will be added at the beginning.
Used to create unique file names for exported submissions.
Used to create unique file names for exported submissions.
Element opties
Dit scheidingsteken wordt gebruikt als een element meerdere waardes heeft.
Kop-opties
Formaat kolomkop
Choose whether to show the element label or element key in each column header.
Opties voor keuzelijsten, keuzerondjes en selectievakjes
Opmaakopties één waarde
Elementen die een enkele optiewaarde verzamelen, zijn onder meer keuzemenu's, keuzebolletjes en knoppen.
Opmaakopties meerdere waardes
Elementen die meerdere optiewaarden verzamelen, zijn onder meer meervoudige keuze, keuzevakjes en schakelaars.
Opmaakopties item
Entity reference options
Entity reference format
The selected columns will be included in the export.
Titel Naam Datumtype/Elementtype
Serienummer serial integer
ID inzending sid integer
Inzending UUID uuid uuid
Inzending URI uri string
Aangemaakt created created
Voltooid completed timestamp
Gewijzigd changed changed
Concept in_draft boolean
Huidige pagina current_page string
Extern IP-adres remote_addr string
Ingediend door uid entity_reference
Taal langcode language
Formulier webform_id entity_reference
Verzonden naar: Entiteitstype entity_type string
Verzonden naar: Entiteits-ID entity_id string
Vergrendeld locked boolean
Vastgeplakt (sticky) sticky boolean
Notities notes string_long
I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent. consent_1 checkbox
[Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE. consent_2 checkbox
Full name: participant_name textfield
Date of consent: date_consent date
Pilot site/country pilot_site select
I participate in this pilot exercise with the role: participant_pilot_role select
Affiliated Organisation affiliated_organisation textfield
Type of affiliated organisation: type_of_affiliated_organisation_ webform_checkboxes_other
Email [optional]: email email
Telephone [optional]: telephone textfield
The functionality of the tool with regards to the user requirements is complete. question_1 webform_scale
The implementation of data and information transfers through the interface functions is correct. question_2 webform_scale
Low frequency of failures to exchange data between the component and other involved components/tools. question_3 webform_scale
No deviation between the actual and reasonably expected results. question_4 webform_scale
Low frequency of encountering inaccurate results/behaviour. question_5 webform_scale
functional_suitability_average functional_suitability_average webform_computed_twig
The component/tool was operational and available when required for use. question_6 webform_scale
The component/tool satisfied user needs for using it under normal operation. question_7 webform_scale
I felt that the component/tool’s functionality was giving expected results and at expected time. question_8 webform_scale
Low frequency of breaks of the component/tool. question_9 webform_scale
Low degree of appearance of failures/faults during the testing/evaluation period. question_10 webform_scale
When a failure occurred, no much time was required before gradual start-up of the component/tool. question_11 webform_scale
Sufficient capability of the involved functionality in restoring itself after an abnormal event or at request. question_12 webform_scale
reliability_average reliability_average webform_computed_twig
I am able to recognise whether the component/tool is appropriate for fulfilling my requirements. question_13 webform_scale
Within a reasonable time of training, I felt confident in using the tool with effectiveness, efficiency, freedom from risk and satisfaction in the specified context of use. question_15 webform_scale
The component/tool offers features that make it easy to operate and control. question_16 webform_scale
I am able to control the tool and its operation is within my expectations. question_17 webform_scale
The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface. question_18 webform_scale
A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction. question_19 webform_scale
The component/tool offered sufficient support in avoiding errors when using its functionality. question_20 webform_scale
usability_average usability_average webform_computed_twig
Satisfactory response time of the functionality. question_21 webform_scale
Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements. question_22 webform_scale
Proper utilisation of memory resources (did you, for example, encounter “low memory” problems?). question_23 webform_scale
Ability for the system to remain operational when pushed to its limits in terms of number of users, frequency of requests, etc. question_24 webform_scale
performance_efficiency_average performance_efficiency_average webform_computed_twig
Sufficiently easy to analyse a failure occurrence. question_25 webform_scale
Sufficiently easy to find the cause of a failure. question_26 webform_scale
Sufficient ability of recording individual activities during operation of the involved services/functions. question_27 webform_scale
Sufficient ability to monitoring the execution status. question_28 webform_scale
Sufficient readiness of services to accept parameterisation. question_29 webform_scale
Sufficient availability of the appropriate mechanisms to be ready for changes at any time. question_30 webform_scale
Sufficient ability to decompose the service/functionality into smaller pieces, without affecting the operation of the others. question_31 webform_scale
Sufficient ability to keeping the effect of the modification of the involved tool/functionality local. question_32 webform_scale
Sufficient availability of information on the tool/component functionality, in order to perform the testing. question_33 webform_scale
Acceptable time needed for testing after a failure resolution. question_34 webform_scale
Sufficient ability to take pieces of the tool/component and use it in another context. question_35 webform_scale
maintainability_average maintainability_average webform_computed_twig
Good adaptability of the tool/component to several hardware and software operation environments and network facilities. question_36 webform_scale
Good adaptability of the tool/component to other infrastructures of water organisations. question_37 webform_scale
Low level of effort required for the tool/component to be adapted to a specific operational environment. question_38 webform_scale
Sufficient documentation for the installation process. question_39 webform_scale
Sufficnent ease and flexibility of installation process. question_40 webform_scale
Sufficient ease of performing subsequent installations. question_41 webform_scale
Sufficient ease of maintaining the tool/component when replacements of other parts of the system happen. question_42 webform_scale
Sufficient ease of maintaining the continuation of the data flows at replacement requests. question_43 webform_scale
portability_average portability_average webform_computed_twig
Sufficient ability to operate within a shared integration environment, together with other tools/components. question_44 webform_scale
Low degree of customisation required when the tool/component needs to co-exist in a specific integration environment. question_45 webform_scale
Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces. question_46 webform_scale
Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces. question_47 webform_scale
compatibility_average compatibility_average webform_computed_twig
The software ensures that only authorised individuals have access to sensitive data. question_48 webform_scale
The software prevents unauthorised access or modification of data, ensuring data accuracy and consistency. question_49 webform_scale
The software provides evidence of actions or events, making it difficult for involved parties to deny their involvement. question_50 webform_scale
The software traces actions and activities to specific entities, ensuring clear accountability. question_51 webform_scale
The software verifies and ensures the true identity of subjects or resources within the system. question_52 webform_scale
security_average security_average webform_computed_twig
Downloadopties
If checked, the export file will be automatically download to your local machine. If unchecked, the export file will be displayed as plain text within your browser.
Order submissions by ascending (oldest first) or descending (newest first).
If checked, only starred/flagged submissions will be downloaded. If unchecked, all submissions will downloaded.
Submission state
Archive options
Select the archive file type for submission file uploads and generated documents.

Funding Support Agencies

EU funding support flag
EU structural funds flag
flag of Republic of Cyprus
CY structural funds
CY Research and Innovation Foundation