Toissijaiset välilehdet
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #36
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Katso video
Lähetyksen tiedot
Lähetyksen numero: 36
Lähetyksen ID: 550
Submission UUID: a03bc7e3-4ff0-4ca9-aebc-1d7a8194dc87
Submission URI: /fi/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Luotu: Ke, 24.04.2024 - 14:19
Valmis: Ke, 24.04.2024 - 14:26
Muuttunut: Ke, 24.04.2024 - 14:26
Remote IP address: 80.74.51.59
Lähettäjä: Anonyymi
Kieli: English
Is draft: Ei
Tämänhetkinen sivu: Valmis
Verkkolomake: 3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Kyllä [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Kyllä Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Gerasimos Antzoulatos Date of consent:: Ti, 09/10/1974 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Germany I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)| Affiliated Organisation: Centre For Research & Technology Hellas - Information Technologies Institute Type of affiliated organisation:: Research Centre Email [optional]:: gantzoulatos@iti.gr Telephone [optional]:: {Empty} Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4 reliability_average: 4 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 3 usability_average: 4 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 4 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4 performance_efficiency_average: 4 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 3 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 4 compatibility_average: 4