3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #26

Lähetyksen numero: 26
Lähetyksen ID: 429
Submission UUID: 58eedee9-e845-49b7-98ec-6decfdc59cbe

Luotu: Pe, 01.03.2024 - 16:15
Valmis: Pe, 01.03.2024 - 16:17
Muuttunut: Ma, 15.04.2024 - 20:47

Remote IP address: 194.151.121.133
Lähettäjä: Anonyymi
Kieli: English

Is draft: Ei
Tämänhetkinen sivu: Valmis
Information and Consent
-----------------------
*[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long*
 

*Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants

Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit 
consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback 
provision.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be 
completed.

 


[1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet
Statement of Informed Consent
-----------------------------
I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Kyllä
[Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Ei

Name and Date
-------------
Full name:: Derk-Jan van Mourik
Date of consent:: Pe, 03/01/2024 - 00:00


Profile of participant
----------------------
Pilot site/country: Netherlands
I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)|
Affiliated Organisation: PWN
Type of affiliated organisation:: Water utility
Email [optional]:: derk-jan.van.mourik@pwn.nl
Telephone [optional]:: +31620739214

Page 1
------
Reliability
-----------
The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4
reliability_average: 4

Usability
---------
The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4
A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 4
usability_average: 4


Page 2
------
Performance efficiency
----------------------
Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 4
Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4
performance_efficiency_average: 4


Page 3
------
Compatibility
-------------
Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 3
Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 4
compatibility_average: 4


Funding Support Agencies

EU funding support flag
EU structural funds flag
flag of Republic of Cyprus
CY structural funds
CY Research and Innovation Foundation