Toissijaiset välilehdet
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #23
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Katso video
Lähetyksen tiedot
Lähetyksen numero: 23
Lähetyksen ID: 418
Submission UUID: 90f6fd38-af03-4fc8-b95e-2f7ae1c77343
Submission URI: /fi/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Luotu: Pe, 01.03.2024 - 12:52
Valmis: Pe, 01.03.2024 - 13:02
Muuttunut: Ma, 15.04.2024 - 20:47
Remote IP address: 80.187.73.74
Lähettäjä: Anonyymi
Kieli: English
Is draft: Ei
Tämänhetkinen sivu: Valmis
Verkkolomake: 3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Kyllä [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Ei Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Hasan Hüseyin Dönmez Date of consent:: Pe, 03/01/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Netherlands I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)| Affiliated Organisation: HST Systemtechnik Type of affiliated organisation:: Water utility Email [optional]:: {Empty} Telephone [optional]:: {Empty} Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4 reliability_average: 4 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 4 usability_average: 4 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 3 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4 performance_efficiency_average: 4 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 4 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 4 compatibility_average: 4