Toissijaiset välilehdet
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #10
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Katso video
Lähetyksen tiedot
Lähetyksen numero: 10
Lähetyksen ID: 369
Submission UUID: 4e600c22-0f16-4b14-ac13-4c474b2120e1
Submission URI: /fi/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Luotu: Pe, 01.03.2024 - 12:42
Valmis: Pe, 01.03.2024 - 12:46
Muuttunut: Ma, 15.04.2024 - 20:47
Remote IP address: 131.237.83.27
Lähettäjä: Anonyymi
Kieli: English
Is draft: Ei
Tämänhetkinen sivu: Valmis
Verkkolomake: 3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Kyllä [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Kyllä Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Yann Friocourt Date of consent:: Pe, 03/01/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Netherlands I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (external to project) Affiliated Organisation: Rijkswaterstaat Type of affiliated organisation:: Regional/national water development authority, Policy/Decision making organisation at national level Email [optional]:: yann.friocourt@rws.nl Telephone [optional]:: 0622357321 Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 3 reliability_average: 3 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 3 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 4 usability_average: 4 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 2 performance_efficiency_average: 2 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 4 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 2 compatibility_average: 3