




Information and Observations ---------------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Observers' Feedback* *Target responders: *WATERVERSE Pilot Observers *Instructions to provide your feedback:* Based on your observations, please, provide comments related to the following: * Functional effectiveness (difficulties or gaps you observed with regards to the functionality offered by the WDME to the users) * Accessibility and Usability (issues with understanding what to do next, issues with using the functionality, issues with understanding the content of a result from a tool, issues with the pilot methodology * Usefulness and acceptance (record any positive or negative comments and experience in the pilot sessions regarding motivation of participants) * Learning effectiveness (evidence of progress achieved regarding the use of the tool, evidence of group working, evidence of peer support) * Engagement and Enjoyment (possible distraction of participants, participants keep making questions, seem happy and motivated, etc.) * Innovation (comments by participants as to the innovative nature of the WDME) * Cultural adaptation (cases where the participants struggle due to non-appropriate instructions for the local culture) * Any other comments not covered in previous items ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Observer Comments:: Name: Hans Pilot Site Observed: Finland Duration of Observation: 1-2 hours Number of Users Observed: 1-2 users Overall Functional Effectiveness: Good System response and performance: Good Overall Accessibility and Usability Issues with understanding the system: Fair Navigation and interface clarity: Good Additional observer comments: The process could be more intuiative if it just happen in one mashup, instead of user need to jump to multiple place for doing some task. Maybe the mashup can auto add some tool if the input and output of 2 consecutive tasks are not compatible.




