2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #8

Lähetyksen tiedot

Lähetyksen numero: 8

Lähetyksen ID: 1668

Submission UUID: 3a22f14a-f0d0-44af-8f9d-56c3e779c0cc

Submission URI: /fi/projects/waterverse/2c_observers_feedback_2_submit

Luotu: To, 03.04.2025 - 13:05

Valmis: To, 03.04.2025 - 13:05

Muuttunut: To, 03.04.2025 - 13:05

Remote IP address: 77.61.99.3

Lähettäjä: Anonyymi

Kieli: English

Is draft: Ei

Tämänhetkinen sivu: Valmis

Verkkolomake: 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]

Observer Comments:	Functional effectiveness: The platform looked like a solid data management solution, that offers a comprehensive suite of solutions. From a first glance, I haven't observed any missing features. I liked the focus on standardizing the data models of the various sources. Accessibility and usability. Sid, who gave the presentation, was able to navigate the tool quite easily. When observing the demo, I found the data query part to be a bit unintuitive. An example was choosing the correct date to query for. Sid had to drag some info, which seemed to be annoying. Also it wasnt entirely clear that the default value was referring to the date range. Usefulness and acceptance: No comments here. Overall, looked good to navigate, but would have to get more experience for my own use cases to properly assess. Learning effectiveness: Demo was clear and I've got a good grasp on what the platform offers. Engagement and enjoyment: Everyone was listening attentively. Innovation: Could be the standard for any collaboration between European water utility companies in exchanging data. Cultural adaptation: None

Observer Comments:

Functional effectiveness: The platform looked like a solid data management solution, that offers a comprehensive suite of solutions. From a first glance, I haven't observed any missing features. I liked the focus on standardizing the data models of the various sources.

Accessibility and usability. Sid, who gave the presentation, was able to navigate the tool quite easily. When observing the demo, I found the data query part to be a bit unintuitive. An example was choosing the correct date to query for. Sid had to drag some info, which seemed to be annoying. Also it wasnt entirely clear that the default value was referring to the date range.

Usefulness and acceptance: No comments here. Overall, looked good to navigate, but would have to get more experience for my own use cases to properly assess.

Learning effectiveness: Demo was clear and I've got a good grasp on what the platform offers.

Engagement and enjoyment: Everyone was listening attentively.

Innovation: Could be the standard for any collaboration between European water utility companies in exchanging data.

Cultural adaptation: None

Toissijaiset välilehdet

2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #8

Funding Support Agencies