




# | Starred | Lukittu | Lisätietoa | Luotu Lajittele nousevasti | Submitted to | Käyttäjä | Kieli | IP osoite | Observer Comments: | Toimenpiteet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #11 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #11 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #11 | To, 03.04.2025 - 13:18 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.63.40.48 | - Effectiveness: Demo showed a coherent story line with tangible results. Looked good. - Accesibility and usability. The demo shows that the major chunks of the functionalities have been realized in the pilot, and they look good. Next steps are also clear. - Usefulness and acceptance. The goal of WMDE is very clear, and the PWN stakeholders appear very motivated and involved in the development and deployment. - Learning effectiveness. PWN stakeholders are well involved from different perspectives, and show that they are getting all sorts of new insights. Looks good. - Engagement and enjoyment. All participants were well involved and active during the session. - Innovation. It’s clear that the whole undertaking is very innovative. |
||
10 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #10 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #10 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #10 | To, 03.04.2025 - 13:06 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.63.106.83 | Useful, i felt of added value, because I could participate in discussions about Cybersecurity. Good interaction between all different kind of stakeholders. Positive vibe | ||
9 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #9 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #9 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #9 | To, 03.04.2025 - 13:05 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.61.99.3 | - the platform looks like an easy way to collect and share data, something that is missing for governmental-semi-governmental data - I’m curious how the ownership/governance of the data will be arranged. Can you request data via the platform, and can the ownership allow and retract entrance to the data - it’s good that tools are integrated in order for the field to start adapting a data strategy, but I can imagine that I would like to use my own tooling. It prevents that the platform is a swiss army knife with unclear goals. - for the dasboards I miss a clear vision on who will use the dashboards in the example use case. What does the user need? And do these dashboards actually solve their challenges? Can we advice the field on the dashboard design pipeline? User research to User testing. I feel like analists and researchers can use python to do their analitics, but an operator really needs information gathered to make an informed decision. - participants seem really interested and ask a lot of questions, pretty technical as well, maybe because some end users(data analists) are present - data governance and availability seem like a great direction to go in to support innovation in the sector. As technical knowledge at governments is still low, they need support and examples to know how to work with a goldmine of data - thanks for the invite, great demo! |
||
8 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #8 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #8 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #8 | To, 03.04.2025 - 13:05 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.61.99.3 | Functional effectiveness: The platform looked like a solid data management solution, that offers a comprehensive suite of solutions. From a first glance, I haven't observed any missing features. I liked the focus on standardizing the data models of the various sources. Accessibility and usability. Sid, who gave the presentation, was able to navigate the tool quite easily. When observing the demo, I found the data query part to be a bit unintuitive. An example was choosing the correct date to query for. Sid had to drag some info, which seemed to be annoying. Also it wasnt entirely clear that the default value was referring to the date range. Usefulness and acceptance: No comments here. Overall, looked good to navigate, but would have to get more experience for my own use cases to properly assess. Learning effectiveness: Demo was clear and I've got a good grasp on what the platform offers. Engagement and enjoyment: Everyone was listening attentively. Innovation: Could be the standard for any collaboration between European water utility companies in exchanging data. Cultural adaptation: None |
||
7 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #7 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #7 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #7 | To, 03.04.2025 - 12:58 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.63.4.196 | It is a very useful platform which slow to combine data from different institutions and sources. It would be convenient to be able to include data from different sources in 1 graph instead of two graphs below. A hands on demo in the future would be useful to get more stakeholders involved | ||
6 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #6 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #6 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #6 | To, 03.04.2025 - 12:58 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.63.81.119 | Very positive impression regarding usability, accesability etc. Good vivid conversation and succesful demo | ||
5 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #5 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #5 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #5 | To, 03.04.2025 - 12:58 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.61.99.3 | There has to be one entity to control the platform. All parties have to agree to this entity being the maintainer. Data is either stored by the entity or should be federated through partners | ||
4 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #4 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #4 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #4 | To, 03.04.2025 - 12:58 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.63.17.67 | .. |
||
3 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #3 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #3 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #3 | To, 03.04.2025 - 12:56 | Anonyymi | englanti | 172.225.253.132 | It’s very useful to use one standard for all data used. This is in my opinion the most useful and most difficult one in the project. And how to combine private data with open data with the right security |
||
2 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #2 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #2 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #2 | To, 03.04.2025 - 12:56 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.63.60.34 | Appears to be very usable with limited training or support | ||
1 | Star/flag 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #1 | Lock 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #1 | Add notes to 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #1 | To, 03.04.2025 - 12:56 | Anonyymi | englanti | 77.63.17.67 | clear presentstions and practical examples that are interesting for the audience, room for in depth questions |