Solapas secundarias
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #46
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Ver vídeo
Información del envío
Número del envío: 46
ID del envío: 578
Submission UUID: 20a670a8-8957-4aa3-851e-a90207057e95
Submission URI: /es/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Creado: Mié, 24/04/2024 - 14:34
Completado: Mié, 24/04/2024 - 14:36
Modificado: Mié, 24/04/2024 - 14:36
Remote IP address: 80.74.51.59
Enviado por: Anónimo
Idioma: English
Is draft: No
Página actual: Completo
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Sí [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: No Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Hasan Hüseyin Dönmez Date of consent:: Mar, 07/29/1986 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Germany I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)| Affiliated Organisation: HST Systemtechnik Type of affiliated organisation:: Water utility Email [optional]:: {Empty} Telephone [optional]:: {Empty} Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 3 reliability_average: 3 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 4 usability_average: 4 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 4 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4 performance_efficiency_average: 4 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 2 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 4 compatibility_average: 3