Solapas secundarias
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #15
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Ver vídeo
Información del envío
Número del envío: 15
ID del envío: 390
Submission UUID: cb4f9b67-387f-4545-8be2-c997ef198c67
Submission URI: /es/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Creado: Vie, 01/03/2024 - 12:49
Completado: Vie, 01/03/2024 - 12:51
Modificado: Lun, 15/04/2024 - 20:47
Remote IP address: 193.177.140.8
Enviado por: Anónimo
Idioma: English
Is draft: No
Página actual: Completo
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Sí [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: No Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Mollie Torello Date of consent:: Mié, 02/28/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Netherlands I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)| Affiliated Organisation: KWR Type of affiliated organisation:: Research Centre Email [optional]:: mollie.torello@kwrwater.nl Telephone [optional]:: {Empty} Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4 reliability_average: 4 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 3 usability_average: 4 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 3 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 3 performance_efficiency_average: 3 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 3 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 3 compatibility_average: 3