2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #24

Número del envío: 24
ID del envío: 1877
Submission UUID: 04e58100-b1d0-4e95-83c6-ad3dd09732d9

Creado: Lun, 08/09/2025 - 09:32
Completado: Lun, 08/09/2025 - 09:32
Modificado: Lun, 08/09/2025 - 09:32

Remote IP address: 91.184.217.90
Enviado por: Anónimo
Idioma: English

Is draft: No
Página actual: Completo
Information and Observations
----------------------------
*[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Observers' Feedback*
 

*Target responders: *WATERVERSE Pilot Observers

*Instructions to provide your feedback:*

Based on your observations, please, provide comments related to the 
following:

 * Functional effectiveness (difficulties or gaps you observed with regards
   to the functionality offered by the WDME to the users)
 * Accessibility and Usability (issues with understanding what to do next,
   issues with using the functionality, issues with understanding the content
   of a result from a tool, issues with the pilot methodology
 * Usefulness and acceptance (record any positive or negative comments and
   experience in the pilot sessions regarding motivation of participants)
 * Learning effectiveness (evidence of progress achieved regarding the use of
   the tool, evidence of group working, evidence of peer support)
 * Engagement and Enjoyment (possible distraction of participants,
   participants keep making questions, seem happy and motivated, etc.)
 * Innovation (comments by participants as to the innovative nature of the
   WDME)
 * Cultural adaptation (cases where the participants struggle due to
   non-appropriate instructions for the local culture)
 * Any other comments not covered in previous items

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Observer Comments::
Name: Hans
Pilot Site Observed: Finland
Duration of Observation: 1-2 hours
Number of Users Observed: 1-2 users
Overall Functional Effectiveness: Good
System response and performance: Good
Overall Accessibility and Usability	Issues with understanding the system: 								Fair
Navigation and interface clarity: Good
Additional observer comments: The process could be more intuiative if it just happen in one mashup, instead of user need to jump to multiple place for doing some task. Maybe the mashup can auto add some tool if the input and output of 2 consecutive tasks are not compatible.



Funding Support Agencies

EU funding support flag
EU structural funds flag
flag of Republic of Cyprus
CY structural funds
CY Research and Innovation Foundation