Δευτερεύουσες καρτέλες
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #60
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Watch video
Submission information
Submission Number: 60
Submission ID: 700
Submission UUID: ec21cedf-15ae-437e-87fe-1bcc72f7d109
Submission URI: /el/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Δημιουργήθηκε: Τρί, 09/10/2024 - 14:30
Completed: Τρί, 09/10/2024 - 14:32
Τροποποιημένο: Τρί, 09/10/2024 - 14:32
Remote IP address: 85.131.102.131
Submitted by: Ανώνυμος
Γλώσσα: English
Is draft: Όχι
Τρέχουσα σελίδα: Complete
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Ναι [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Όχι Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Leigh Lunas Date of consent:: Πέμ, 09/05/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Finland I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)| Affiliated Organisation: {Empty} Type of affiliated organisation:: Water utility Email [optional]:: {Empty} Telephone [optional]:: {Empty} Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 3 reliability_average: 3 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 2 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 2 usability_average: 2 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 4 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4 performance_efficiency_average: 4 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 4 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 2 compatibility_average: 3