Δευτερεύουσες καρτέλες
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #33
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Watch video
Submission information
Submission Number: 33
Submission ID: 513
Submission UUID: b85af590-3803-4f81-a57e-0960d8a5d818
Submission URI: /el/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Δημιουργήθηκε: Τετ, 03/27/2024 - 13:14
Completed: Τετ, 03/27/2024 - 13:15
Τροποποιημένο: Δευ, 04/15/2024 - 20:47
Remote IP address: 94.32.160.52
Submitted by: Ανώνυμος
Γλώσσα: English
Is draft: Όχι
Τρέχουσα σελίδα: Complete
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Ναι [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Όχι Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Eloisa Vargiu Date of consent:: Τετ, 03/27/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Spain I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)| Affiliated Organisation: CETaqua Type of affiliated organisation:: Research Centre Email [optional]:: {Empty} Telephone [optional]:: {Empty} Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4 reliability_average: 4 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 3 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 4 usability_average: 4 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 3 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4 performance_efficiency_average: 4 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 4 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 2 compatibility_average: 3