Δευτερεύουσες καρτέλες
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #14
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Watch video
Submission information
Submission Number: 14
Submission ID: 386
Submission UUID: 8986a31f-abdf-4b73-83f2-325831897826
Submission URI: /el/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Δημιουργήθηκε: Παρ, 03/01/2024 - 12:48
Completed: Παρ, 03/01/2024 - 12:50
Τροποποιημένο: Δευ, 04/15/2024 - 20:47
Remote IP address: 89.205.137.184
Submitted by: Ανώνυμος
Γλώσσα: English
Is draft: Όχι
Τρέχουσα σελίδα: Complete
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Ναι [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Ναι Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Dave Ebbelaar Date of consent:: Τετ, 02/28/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Netherlands I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: IT personnel at the water organisation Affiliated Organisation: PWN Type of affiliated organisation:: Water utility Email [optional]:: {Empty} Telephone [optional]:: {Empty} Page 1 ------ Functional suitability ---------------------- The functionality of the tool with regards to the user requirements is complete.: 4 The implementation of data and information transfers through the interface functions is correct.: 4 Low frequency of failures to exchange data between the component and other involved components/tools.: 4 No deviation between the actual and reasonably expected results.: 4 Low frequency of encountering inaccurate results/behaviour.: 4 functional_suitability_average: 4 Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4 When a failure occurred, no much time was required before gradual start-up of the component/tool.: 4 Sufficient capability of the involved functionality in restoring itself after an abnormal event or at request.: 4 reliability_average: 4 Usability --------- I am able to recognise whether the component/tool is appropriate for fulfilling my requirements.: 4 The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 2 The component/tool offered sufficient support in avoiding errors when using its functionality.: 2 usability_average: 3 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 4 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4 Proper utilisation of memory resources (did you, for example, encounter “low memory” problems?).: 4 Ability for the system to remain operational when pushed to its limits in terms of number of users, frequency of requests, etc.: 3 performance_efficiency_average: 4 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 4 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 4 compatibility_average: 4 Security -------- The software ensures that only authorised individuals have access to sensitive data.: 3 The software prevents unauthorised access or modification of data, ensuring data accuracy and consistency.: 3 The software provides evidence of actions or events, making it difficult for involved parties to deny their involvement.: 3 The software traces actions and activities to specific entities, ensuring clear accountability.: 4 The software verifies and ensures the true identity of subjects or resources within the system.: 4 security_average: 3