Δευτερεύουσες καρτέλες
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Submission #12
The Plain text page displays a submission's general information and data as plain text. Watch video
Submission information
Submission Number: 12
Submission ID: 380
Submission UUID: 6955135e-23f2-41ad-9c16-10e0caf21eb0
Submission URI: /el/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Δημιουργήθηκε: Παρ, 03/01/2024 - 12:46
Completed: Παρ, 03/01/2024 - 12:49
Τροποποιημένο: Δευ, 04/15/2024 - 20:47
Remote IP address: 185.188.251.153
Submitted by: Ανώνυμος
Γλώσσα: English
Is draft: Όχι
Τρέχουσα σελίδα: Complete
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Ναι [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Όχι Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Joris Ebbelaar Date of consent:: Τετ, 02/28/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Netherlands I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Operator (user of WATERVERSE WDME) at the water organisation Affiliated Organisation: PWN Type of affiliated organisation:: Water utility Email [optional]:: {Empty} Telephone [optional]:: {Empty} Page 1 ------ Functional suitability ---------------------- The functionality of the tool with regards to the user requirements is complete.: 3 The implementation of data and information transfers through the interface functions is correct.: 3 Low frequency of failures to exchange data between the component and other involved components/tools.: 2 No deviation between the actual and reasonably expected results.: 3 Low frequency of encountering inaccurate results/behaviour.: 3 functional_suitability_average: 3 Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 2 The component/tool satisfied user needs for using it under normal operation.: 2 I felt that the component/tool’s functionality was giving expected results and at expected time.: 3 Low frequency of breaks of the component/tool.: 2 Low degree of appearance of failures/faults during the testing/evaluation period.: 2 When a failure occurred, no much time was required before gradual start-up of the component/tool.: 2 Sufficient capability of the involved functionality in restoring itself after an abnormal event or at request.: 2 reliability_average: 2 Usability --------- I am able to recognise whether the component/tool is appropriate for fulfilling my requirements.: 2 Within a reasonable time of training, I felt confident in using the tool with effectiveness, efficiency, freedom from risk and satisfaction in the specified context of use.: 2 The component/tool offers features that make it easy to operate and control.: 2 I am able to control the tool and its operation is within my expectations.: 3 The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 2 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 2 The component/tool offered sufficient support in avoiding errors when using its functionality.: 2 usability_average: 2 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 3 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 3 performance_efficiency_average: 3 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 3 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 3 compatibility_average: 3