Δευτερεύουσες καρτέλες
2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Submission #8
The View page displays a submission's general information and data. Watch video
Submission information
Submission Number: 8
Submission ID: 1668
Submission UUID: 3a22f14a-f0d0-44af-8f9d-56c3e779c0cc
Submission URI: /el/projects/waterverse/2c_observers_feedback_2_submit
Δημιουργήθηκε: Πέμ, 04/03/2025 - 13:05
Completed: Πέμ, 04/03/2025 - 13:05
Τροποποιημένο: Πέμ, 04/03/2025 - 13:05
Remote IP address: 77.61.99.3
Submitted by: Ανώνυμος
Γλώσσα: English
Is draft: Όχι
Τρέχουσα σελίδα: Complete
Information and Observations
Target responders: WATERVERSE Pilot Observers
Instructions to provide your feedback:
Based on your observations, please, provide comments related to the following:
- Functional effectiveness (difficulties or gaps you observed with regards to the functionality offered by the WDME to the users)
- Accessibility and Usability (issues with understanding what to do next, issues with using the functionality, issues with understanding the content of a result from a tool, issues with the pilot methodology
- Usefulness and acceptance (record any positive or negative comments and experience in the pilot sessions regarding motivation of participants)
- Learning effectiveness (evidence of progress achieved regarding the use of the tool, evidence of group working, evidence of peer support)
- Engagement and Enjoyment (possible distraction of participants, participants keep making questions, seem happy and motivated, etc.)
- Innovation (comments by participants as to the innovative nature of the WDME)
- Cultural adaptation (cases where the participants struggle due to non-appropriate instructions for the local culture)
- Any other comments not covered in previous items
Funding Support Agencies
Accessibility and usability. Sid, who gave the presentation, was able to navigate the tool quite easily. When observing the demo, I found the data query part to be a bit unintuitive. An example was choosing the correct date to query for. Sid had to drag some info, which seemed to be annoying. Also it wasnt entirely clear that the default value was referring to the date range.
Usefulness and acceptance: No comments here. Overall, looked good to navigate, but would have to get more experience for my own use cases to properly assess.
Learning effectiveness: Demo was clear and I've got a good grasp on what the platform offers.
Engagement and enjoyment: Everyone was listening attentively.
Innovation: Could be the standard for any collaboration between European water utility companies in exchanging data.
Cultural adaptation: None