3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Eingabe #36

Information and Consent
-----------------------
*[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long*
 

*Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants

Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit 
consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback 
provision.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be 
completed.

 


[1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet
Statement of Informed Consent
-----------------------------
I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Ja
[Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Ja

Name and Date
-------------
Full name:: Gerasimos Antzoulatos
Date of consent:: Di., 09/10/1974 - 00:00


Profile of participant
----------------------
Pilot site/country: Germany
I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)|
Affiliated Organisation: Centre For Research & Technology Hellas - Information Technologies Institute
Type of affiliated organisation:: Research Centre
Email [optional]:: gantzoulatos@iti.gr
Telephone [optional]:: {Leer}

Page 1
------
Reliability
-----------
The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4
reliability_average: 4

Usability
---------
The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4
A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 3
usability_average: 4


Page 2
------
Performance efficiency
----------------------
Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 4
Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4
performance_efficiency_average: 4


Page 3
------
Compatibility
-------------
Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 3
Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 4
compatibility_average: 4