Sekundäre Reiter
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Eingabe #31
Die Seite Klartext zeigt die allgemeinen Informationen und Daten einer Eingabe als Klartext an. Video ansehen
Informationen über die Eingabe
Eingabennummer: 31
Eingaben-ID: 504
UUID der Webformular-Eingabe: de2c9829-d4a3-4ad7-8204-4c6e2590f328
URI der Webformular-Eingabe: /de/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Erstellt: Mi., 27.03.2024 - 13:06
Abgeschlossen: Mi., 27.03.2024 - 13:07
Geändert: Mo., 15.04.2024 - 20:47
Remote-IP-Adresse: 31.153.108.250
Erstellt von: Gast
Sprache: English
Ist Entwurf: Nein
Aktuelle Seite: Vollständig
Webformular: 3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Ja [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Ja Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Demetrios Eliades Date of consent:: Mi., 03/27/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Cyprus I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (external to project) Affiliated Organisation: KIOS Research and Innovation Center of Excellence Type of affiliated organisation:: Research Centre, University Email [optional]:: eldemet@ucy.ac.cy Telephone [optional]:: 99527887 Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4 reliability_average: 4 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 2 usability_average: 3 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 4 performance_efficiency_average: 4 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 4 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 3 compatibility_average: 4
Funding Support Agencies