Sekundäre Reiter
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Eingabe #19
Die Seite Klartext zeigt die allgemeinen Informationen und Daten einer Eingabe als Klartext an. Video ansehen
Informationen über die Eingabe
Eingabennummer: 19
Eingaben-ID: 409
UUID der Webformular-Eingabe: 4fcb0288-f35d-4811-99df-a8a0fe322245
URI der Webformular-Eingabe: /de/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Erstellt: Fr., 01.03.2024 - 12:57
Abgeschlossen: Fr., 01.03.2024 - 12:59
Geändert: Mo., 15.04.2024 - 20:47
Remote-IP-Adresse: 192.87.214.3
Erstellt von: Gast
Sprache: English
Ist Entwurf: Nein
Aktuelle Seite: Vollständig
Webformular: 3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Ja [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Ja Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Gerard van den Berg Date of consent:: Fr., 03/01/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: Netherlands I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Observer (partner organisation)| Affiliated Organisation: KWR Water Research Institute Type of affiliated organisation:: Research Centre Email [optional]:: gerard.van.den.berg@kwrwater.nl Telephone [optional]:: {Leer} Page 1 ------ Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 4 reliability_average: 4 Usability --------- The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 4 usability_average: 4 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 4 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 4 performance_efficiency_average: 4 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 4 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 4 compatibility_average: 4