Sekundäre Reiter
3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]: Eingabe #9
Die Seite Klartext zeigt die allgemeinen Informationen und Daten einer Eingabe als Klartext an. Video ansehen
Informationen über die Eingabe
Eingabennummer: 9
Eingaben-ID: 337
UUID der Webformular-Eingabe: 7080200d-24ea-455c-9af1-03d9676cfdac
URI der Webformular-Eingabe: /de/projects/waterverse/waterverse_pilots_feedback_long_submit
Erstellt: Fr., 16.02.2024 - 15:30
Abgeschlossen: Fr., 16.02.2024 - 15:32
Geändert: Mo., 15.04.2024 - 20:47
Remote-IP-Adresse: 194.72.48.162
Erstellt von: Gast
Sprache: English
Ist Entwurf: Nein
Aktuelle Seite: Vollständig
Webformular: 3. Pilot Feedback - Long [WATERVERSE Project Pilots]
Information and Consent ----------------------- *[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Pilot feedback - Long* *Target responders: *All WATERVERSE Pilot Participants Please, read the Participant Information Sheet [1] and provide your explicit consent below before moving to the pilot participation and feedback provision. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The pre-assessment questionnaire requires approximately 10 minutes to be completed. [1] https://public.phoebeinnovations.com/projects/waterverse/information_sheet Statement of Informed Consent ----------------------------- I have read the above statements and I hereby provided my explicit consent.: Ja [Optional] I agree that my personal data can be used for contacting me in the context of inviting me in future events of interest, related to the WATERVERSE.: Nein Name and Date ------------- Full name:: Geoff Mandeno Date of consent:: Fr., 02/16/2024 - 00:00 Profile of participant ---------------------- Pilot site/country: United Kingdom I participate in this pilot exercise with the role:: Operator (user of WATERVERSE WDME) at the water organisation Affiliated Organisation: South West Water Type of affiliated organisation:: Water utility Email [optional]:: {Leer} Telephone [optional]:: {Leer} Page 1 ------ Functional suitability ---------------------- The functionality of the tool with regards to the user requirements is complete.: 1 The implementation of data and information transfers through the interface functions is correct.: 3 Low frequency of failures to exchange data between the component and other involved components/tools.: 3 No deviation between the actual and reasonably expected results.: 3 Low frequency of encountering inaccurate results/behaviour.: 3 functional_suitability_average: 3 Reliability ----------- The component/tool was operational and available when required for use.: 3 The component/tool satisfied user needs for using it under normal operation.: 3 I felt that the component/tool’s functionality was giving expected results and at expected time.: 3 Low frequency of breaks of the component/tool.: 3 Low degree of appearance of failures/faults during the testing/evaluation period.: 4 When a failure occurred, no much time was required before gradual start-up of the component/tool.: 4 Sufficient capability of the involved functionality in restoring itself after an abnormal event or at request.: 4 reliability_average: 3 Usability --------- I am able to recognise whether the component/tool is appropriate for fulfilling my requirements.: 3 Within a reasonable time of training, I felt confident in using the tool with effectiveness, efficiency, freedom from risk and satisfaction in the specified context of use.: 4 The component/tool offers features that make it easy to operate and control.: 4 I am able to control the tool and its operation is within my expectations.: 4 The component/tool has sufficient attractiveness of the user interface.: 4 A sufficiently high proportion of the user interface elements could be customised to my satisfaction.: 4 The component/tool offered sufficient support in avoiding errors when using its functionality.: 1 usability_average: 3 Page 2 ------ Performance efficiency ---------------------- Satisfactory response time of the functionality.: 2 Throughput of the operations close to the specified requirements.: 1 performance_efficiency_average: 2 Page 3 ------ Compatibility ------------- Sufficient use of standard application programming interfaces.: 4 Sufficient openness and ease of use of the interfaces.: 4 compatibility_average: 4