2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Eingabe #20

Eingabennummer: 20
Eingaben-ID: 1873
UUID der Webformular-Eingabe: 17459b90-9ba2-4176-99bc-35b0f7c1e8b6

Erstellt: Mo., 08.09.2025 - 09:17
Abgeschlossen: Mo., 08.09.2025 - 09:17
Geändert: Mo., 08.09.2025 - 09:17

Remote-IP-Adresse: 91.184.217.90
Erstellt von: Gast
Sprache: English

Ist Entwurf: Nein
Aktuelle Seite: Vollständig
Information and Observations
----------------------------
*[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Observers' Feedback*
 

*Target responders: *WATERVERSE Pilot Observers

*Instructions to provide your feedback:*

Based on your observations, please, provide comments related to the 
following:

 * Functional effectiveness (difficulties or gaps you observed with regards
   to the functionality offered by the WDME to the users)
 * Accessibility and Usability (issues with understanding what to do next,
   issues with using the functionality, issues with understanding the content
   of a result from a tool, issues with the pilot methodology
 * Usefulness and acceptance (record any positive or negative comments and
   experience in the pilot sessions regarding motivation of participants)
 * Learning effectiveness (evidence of progress achieved regarding the use of
   the tool, evidence of group working, evidence of peer support)
 * Engagement and Enjoyment (possible distraction of participants,
   participants keep making questions, seem happy and motivated, etc.)
 * Innovation (comments by participants as to the innovative nature of the
   WDME)
 * Cultural adaptation (cases where the participants struggle due to
   non-appropriate instructions for the local culture)
 * Any other comments not covered in previous items

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Observer Comments::
Name: Concepcion
Pilot Site Observed: Finland
Duration of Observation: 1-2 hours
Number of Users Observed: 1-2 users
Overall Functional Effectiveness: Good
System response and performance: Good
Overall Accessibility and Usability	Issues with understanding the system: Fair								
Navigation and interface clarity: Good
User Engagement Level: Moderate


Funding Support Agencies

EU funding support flag
EU structural funds flag
flag of Republic of Cyprus
CY structural funds
CY Research and Innovation Foundation