2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Eingabe #14

Informationen über die Eingabe

Eingabennummer: 14

Eingaben-ID: 1775

UUID der Webformular-Eingabe: 0ce7420a-5d90-40f1-bac1-c3e45d1da921

URI der Webformular-Eingabe: /de/projects/waterverse/2c_observers_feedback_2_submit

Erstellt: Fr., 25.07.2025 - 12:22

Abgeschlossen: Fr., 25.07.2025 - 12:22

Geändert: Fr., 25.07.2025 - 12:22

Remote-IP-Adresse: 163.116.184.133

Erstellt von: Gast

Sprache: English

Ist Entwurf: Nein

Aktuelle Seite: Vollständig

Webformular: 2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]

Information and Observations

[WaterVerse Project Pilots] Observers' Feedback

Target responders: WATERVERSE Pilot Observers

Instructions to provide your feedback:

Based on your observations, please, provide comments related to the following:

Functional effectiveness (difficulties or gaps you observed with regards to the functionality offered by the WDME to the users)
Accessibility and Usability (issues with understanding what to do next, issues with using the functionality, issues with understanding the content of a result from a tool, issues with the pilot methodology
Usefulness and acceptance (record any positive or negative comments and experience in the pilot sessions regarding motivation of participants)
Learning effectiveness (evidence of progress achieved regarding the use of the tool, evidence of group working, evidence of peer support)
Engagement and Enjoyment (possible distraction of participants, participants keep making questions, seem happy and motivated, etc.)
Innovation (comments by participants as to the innovative nature of the WDME)
Cultural adaptation (cases where the participants struggle due to non-appropriate instructions for the local culture)
Any other comments not covered in previous items

Observer Comments: Functional effectiveness: I think is a good example the spanish pilot but I think it should exist several options for th euser for dealing with incompleted data, as recollected data from groundwater or related elements from the case probably will not be complete, and here should exist options to deal on this (I don't remember exactly if you showed this, but as more options you have the better is)
Accesibility: no comments
Usefulness and acceptance: I do not find issues related the items mentioned between brackets, but I think it will be challenging "convince" other water utilities/centers/etc to use the tool if they have their own systems for data management. Will the tool be free and open to the public?
Learning efectiveness: no comments
Engagement and Enjoyment: I think the public was engaged and there were interesting interventions. Nevertheless, in the future could be good to play a little more with the tool in a different more interactive way. I.e. providing datasets and the tool to play
Innovation: from the challenges recollected during one of the blocks I think could exists areas where innovate
Cultural adaptation: no comments

Sekundäre Reiter

2c. Observers' Feedback [WATERVERSE Project Pilots-2]: Eingabe #14

Funding Support Agencies